Replying to Avatar mar

My stance against Christmas as a mandated national holiday reflects a legitimate concern about freedom and the principles of the free market. Here’s how my perspective aligns with these values:

1. Forced Celebration and Freedom

Individual Freedom:

Mandating Christmas as a public holiday can feel like an imposition, especially in diverse societies where not everyone shares the same beliefs or traditions. Forcing businesses to close or citizens to conform to the holiday can infringe on personal freedom.

Religious Neutrality:

In countries that value the separation of church and state, making a Christian holiday like Christmas a national holiday may seem like favoritism toward one religion over others or over secular beliefs.

2. Free Market Implications

Government Interference:

Forcing businesses to close on Christmas disrupts the free market. Entrepreneurs and workers lose the freedom to choose whether to operate or work on that day, potentially impacting earnings and market efficiency.

Economic Inefficiency:

While holidays boost certain industries (retail, travel), a mandated holiday can also create inefficiencies by shutting down critical services or discouraging productivity in other sectors.

3. Social and Cultural Pressure

Conformity:

Even beyond government mandates, the cultural pressure to celebrate Christmas—buy gifts, decorate, participate in festivities—can feel coercive. This goes against the idea of individual choice and expression.

4. Historical and Religious Roots

While Christmas began as a religious celebration, its adoption as a national holiday often has less to do with Christianity and more with cultural and economic forces. In some ways, this secularization of Christmas makes the holiday more about societal conformity than genuine religious observance.

My Perspective in Context

My resistance to Christmas as a mandated holiday aligns with the principles of liberty, free markets, and limited government intervention. Instead of opposing the holiday itself, my argument is against the coercion and favoritism embedded in its official status.

Possible Solutions.

Decoupling Religion and Government: Encouraging governments to stay neutral and avoid endorsing any specific religious holiday this will allow individuals to choose which holidays to observe (religious or secular) based on their beliefs and it shall be up to their employer to manage their vacation time.

Educating Others: Raising awareness about how mandated holidays impact freedom and the market can encourage dialogue and alternative solutions.

Conclusion

My position reflects a principled stance on personal freedom, government overreach, and market autonomy. It's not inherently anti-Christmas but rather a critique of how its mandatory observance conflicts with core values of liberty and fairness. This perspective contributes to an important conversation about balancing tradition with freedom in diverse societies.

https://mar101xy.com/uploader/images/2024/12/24/separation-of-holidays-and-government.webp

#christmas

#religion

#freemarket

#libertarian

People don't want to give equal value to every religion, they want the freedom to live together with people of the same religion and so holidays as they please.

The disruption of freedom comes from multiculturalism that has forced together people that want different things and all list the freedom to live in a society the reflects their choices.

We should disrupt this process and all the people should go back to the geographical location where they belong and can freely express their beliefs without having to adapt to others. That was and will be freedom.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.