People are starting to figure out that Saylor is a fiat larp

People are starting to figure out that Saylor is a fiat larp

Massive one, rug pull incoming ⏳
Incentive theory.
People are only as good as their incentives.
-He’s worth so much that his values are becoming skewed. A lot of what he says now is deliberately careful. For example He knows that referring to BTC as money puts him at risk from harsh govt regulations (think Tornado cash) so he goes out of his way to say btc is a commodity, not a currency. We all know btc is the most fungible commodity ever so… it’s definitely a currency.
I love the guy but people need to be prepared for the day when he does something that lets us down.
Nothing more than a bit of publicity. 
What he do now?
Owns a public company. He has to toe the fiat line.
But they’re referring to his recent appearance on nostr:npub1gdu7w6l6w65qhrdeaf6eyywepwe7v7ezqtugsrxy7hl7ypjsvxksd76nak ‘s podcast where they disagreed about yield
Frankly, I thought each were being a little obtuse towards the others' position. Bitcoin could be exchanged for shares of equity (in a startup, for example). Bitcoin could be loaned out at a given rate of interest (to a startup, for example). Each strategy may be used to improve the original holder's overall financial situation; but they each come with their own set of risks. Both can be true. I don't really see the controversy.
Yeah I agree it’s kind of silly. They’re both rigid in their ideologies. Probably to their own disadvantage
I’m scared he would end up being a Trojan horse
You don't think there is a chance he's intentionally playing dumb?
TBF It's very hard to imagine a world without credit
And let's not forget about the thing with the digital identity that he was talking about, I'm not so sure that the book is closed on that whole thing.