‪Bitcoin Core v30 is a mistake.‬

‪Removing OP_RETURN limits opens the door to endless junk data, inscriptions, and fee spikes that punish regular users.‬

‪Bitcoin’s strength is its minimalism — not turning the base layer into a playground for experiments.‬

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Cry harder 😘

This isn’t emotion. It’s protocol integrity. Bitcoin doesn’t need to evolve, it needs to endure. Don’t try to improve what already works. Maintain it.

Don't talk to the enemy. There is nothing productive to accomplish he is bought and paid for

You really need to touch grass. There are no enemies in this. Just differences of opinion about very complicated technical issues, governance questions and game theoretical scenarios.

Not talking is not going to take us anywhere. It's literally the worst possible approach.

More talking and hashing through and reconciling these complex issues is the only productive path forward.

Also, if history is any precedent, during the block size wars similarly irrational vilificiation led those perpetrating it and hopping aboard that narrative to sell their bitcoin and becoming BCH and BSV bagholders. Think it through.

We all have an interest in bitcoin's success. Vilifying and slandering long time contributors is not the right way to go about this. Calm and rational discussion is required.

I see the shitcoiner incel Nostr Rambo back on duty🖕

It's just a .config thingie, isn't it?

Can't some thrustworthy group PLEASE compile that thing with an adopted .config and distribute it?

So any Pleb with no skill can download core v30 with OP_Retuen_Limit ajusted to 80 or whatever?

I mean it's open source...