confined to language and perception produced from the mind, it seems very logical that every attempt to explain or rationalise existence seems to end up in paradox

it also seems rather ironic we even try to explain existence that is patently experiential

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Do you write these notes from your own insight? I love reading them because it challenges my brain a lot πŸ€€πŸ’―

yes lol i started out researching the concepts of conservatism and libertarianism and ended up here, overthinking society and life and existence

Lol it's really impressive. You seem to be able to verbalize very high levels of complexity.

wow thank you haha, this is new, never had anyone tell me THAT

but i most often also do not speak that much or write thoughts down like this lol

Wen book

my actual reaction @ the idea of me writing book

Start with short story, would read!

Also when selfportrait painting??

inshallah one day

first want to work on other unfinished, relatively big, pieces 😁

for example -

literally waiting to be finished for 1y

the butchered nose rly got to me

Don't be sad cat. Better to be breadcat and paint ☺️😁

Hmm I like this painting, nice colours ☺️ just needs a voorhoofd haha

i get you're saying that but i wasnt going for a truly realistic head here hehe

wanted to portray some kind of defender being with a blindfold that has a sats symbol shining through somehow

and hoping ai one day can help organise them, perchance

A Man Without Words https://a.co/d/9miw0WA

someone just replied to my note with:

"Assuming an underlying logos as root cause of objective truth/reality, any apparent paradox shrinks to a spiritual translation issue."

food for thought

nostr:nevent1qqs23kzmkqryl4k3h8wgvz4dyhzqynt7fdm884s2m98kgc2djg6eg9cppamhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5pzqxq2d4pv04j03su43kw3ph26gyt742kw4rnlnqrcr6d9xymv745nqvzqqqqqqynuytk8

Daniel Schmactenberger:

"Inside of my body brain package that I call I physically that I think my consciousness associated with doesn't include all of the coral reef.

It doesn't include all of the plants and doesn't include the soil microbiome. I don't think of those as I, but I wouldn't exist without all of that.

So can I say that my consciousness is an emergent property of this thing without saying it's an emergent property of all of that? Because this thing is an emergent property of all of that. And so without the plants, I'm not even an idea, right?

There isn't even a well-formed concept of me that exists without an atmosphere and oxygen and without the sun - and without the other planets that keep the asteroids from hitting us, it just keep going on, and we find the entire universe is configured in a way that I'm the emergent property of a part of it.

You take away the galactic center, you take away the sun, you take away the other planets, you take away the gravitational field, or the electromagnetic field, or the bacteria, and I don't exist.

So my consciousness is not an emergent property. So imagine putting me in a complete and perfect vacuum and just imagine I didn't physically die for a moment, which I of course would. What would the sensory experience be? There'd be no sensory input. What would the contents of consciousness with no sensory input be?

I think in words that were developed by other people. I think in images that were created by other people. All of the contents of my consciousness came from the world."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJQac_T_rPo

Clip starts from 1:11:27