It's obvious to me how Twitter would benefit by becoming decentralized and exit the censorship way of doing things, which is to give itself a chance to survive and thrive, because if they don't they will die on the vine. Thank you for your kind apology, and I forgive you. I don't begrudge you your opinion, and I respect it. I just don't agree, and that's okay. We can disagree and still honor one another. You're the one who asked for my perspective, so I gave it to you. If you think it doesn't make sense, flush it. I could be wrong. But my opinions and perspectives don't mean I don't belong here. Our conversation started with my assertion that Twitter should join Nostr before it's too late, so it doesn't behoove me to seek to understand your perspective while I'm providing evidence for mine, as you asked me to. I agree with you that Twitter is legacy tech. However, no matter how much company inertia, or any other company has going on, if they are headed in the wrong direction they can change. It may be unlikely, even highly unlikely, but it's not impossible, and that's my point. You're right that it's probably too late for Twitter, but until they close their doors they can make a change for the better. I feel sad that you feel like explaining your perspective in detail won't change mine. If you're willing to share your perspective, I would really appreciate it and would do my best to understand what you mean and where you're coming from because I'm sure you have insights I'm not privy to. Would you please share your perspective? If so, thank you! If not, I understand. Blessings!