nostr:npub1jdnjk3rursksr6s6sc4wdst4ag9sf9fvrnqc7f5mfsegps07gh2q42ycw3 i don't know the sampling rate/resolution of the ice cores. it may be that such rapid change happened before but is beyond the bandwidth of what ice cores can do. someone who knows ice cores will have to answer that.
nostr:npub1jdnjk3rursksr6s6sc4wdst4ag9sf9fvrnqc7f5mfsegps07gh2q42ycw3 further down in the thread you're replying to, i posted this:
https://berserker.town/@thor/110937443095134562
i feel this is fairly close to smoking gun evidence.
also, most of the measures that are proposed to mitigate it are to my liking.
Discussion
nostr:npub1jdnjk3rursksr6s6sc4wdst4ag9sf9fvrnqc7f5mfsegps07gh2q42ycw3 however, the temp curve was pretty flat before the industrial revolution and then rapidly picked up.
seeing as us humans are pretty good at fucking up, i'm leaning towards us fucking up this one too
I saw a study showing that, I think it was called like interstitial something, it showed that the sampling resolution of ice cores was insufficient to see temperature changes in the 1-2 decade range, then reevaluated some data and showed that rapid warming cycles happen frequently that just don't show in typical datasets. Wish I had the study saved somewhere.