The counterparty risk of holding Cashu-mint–issued ecash sats is proportional to the holding time. The longer you hold ecash sats issued by a Cashu mint, the greater your counterparty risk.

When a user wants to send 10,000 Cashu ecash sats to a friend for better privacy and convenience (without needing the recipient’s address), Keychat Wallet can combine the minting and sending of Cashu sats into a single operation instead of maintaining a continuous 10,000-ecash-sat balance. This reduces the time the user holds the ecash sats.

Thus, the Cashu mint is better used as a privacy-preserving bridge rather than for secure long-term storage.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzpwleyw4fy3sxt7yvgrran0mpenxqlululur94r9jlax0hd3q3rc7qyxhwumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmvqyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnhd9hx2qg5waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t0qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqqyrapgfj9ce35gyhsklstalkgcn6pukgnlnyf739m6lhps5ltr0fnstlwnjr

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The more we can optimise custodial lightning for latency and UX the more I wonder if Cashu is really needed in the loop.

Ecash's not requiring a recipient address appears to be something other solutions don't provide.

Yes, but when you melt it's back to lightning. And as you say the longer you wait to melt the higher the counterparty risk. And I have a feeling Cashu is going to drift towards P2PK over time for security, which is basically an address.

🤔