the real reason why deepseek is better than chatgpt is simple
censorship by woke, eugenicist megalomaniacs
less work, same result because not censorship
Discussion
You don't consider the Chinese to be eugenicists or censorious?
they are more pragmatic
so they let their CS guys unfilter the data
The End.
Eugenics means "noble breed" or better breeding.
I think the term you're looking for is the opposite, dysgenics.
eugenics is a philosophy favored by people who consider themselves to be above humans, superior, self appointed "gods" over the rest of us
if it were a question of my sheep or my cabbages or my cats, ok, i'm a eugenicist
but if it's a question of my fellow humans
get behind me satan
Eugenics just means better breeding.
If you choose to marry and reproduce with someone who is attractive and fit, over someone who is fat and ugly, congratulations; you are practicing better breeding, aka eugenics.
I'm not gonna conflate a long established definition of misanthropy with simple discrimination, aesthetics and engineering principles. It's not about the positive semantics, it's the negative they, people like Hitler and Sanger and the rest who call their sin virtue.
You could differentiate between voluntary and coerced eugenics. When people get into a tizzy about hidlur and planned pre-natal killing they are referring to the latter.
They also and pretend that the former does not exist and BTW if it did, it is also immoral.
To seek to promote regression is plainly retarded.
To seek progress through murder is insane.
Of course we want to make better offspring than ourselves. It doesn't require cloaking this parental instinct in a fancy Greek derived word.
They used to use the word "progress" when I was a child. I doubt you use eugenics in ordinary speech to signify this in relation to your progeny.
My point is that people should be asking themselves "Who would be against the improvement, via better breeding, of any group of humans?
Who would seek to always tie any mention of the concept of improving a population via better breeding, to scary images of forced sterilization and industrialized death camps?
Might these same people be intent on dysgenics for the masses, and eugenics for themselves, to better enslave humanity and cement their rule?"
that is a motte and bailey fallacy like antifascism
i don't have time for talking to people who make fake arguments