Bitcoin is backed by those who built for it.
The reason Bcash hasn't won the fork war was their lack of building.
BCH would have won if bullbitcoin, coinkite, seedsigner, swan, strike have built for BCH.
True or no?
Discussion
Or inferior building
Some of those co.'s/projects didn't exist when bcash happened
Just wait for bcash 2.0, then it'll be real fun to see who's on what side
I mean, a fork war isn't something that ever ends.
If those people would have built the exact same thing but for BCH, maybe the outcome *today* would have been different.
Chance are I would have turned into a bch guy once I stumbled into Twitter.
Prob all would have
Very excited for bcash 2.0 it'll be fun to watch
Prob this year too
I'm very ecxited too.
I can imagine the next for to be a "compliant Bitcoin" pushed by coinbase, Blackrock, microstrategy and government.
Exactly
It'll be "Store of Value" v. "Medium of Exchange"
We already know which one has won
Ironically bcash 1.0 was for medium of exchange, and lost, due to chain storage bloat
I named this Compliant version of "Bitcoin" about a year ago, I call it Bitcoin Black.
Excellent. Many of us are on the same page
The compliant chain will be the store of value one? Does that mean people should hold this one when they plan on saving for a long time?
Sure, just as bch is the payment version of btc, and still very well is today.
But you can hold whichever one you want.
It moreso means the ones we just spoke of blackroxck, etf's, govt.'s, etc) will try to change the code, to make more like the shiny rock that can prop up fiat than a tool of exchange (as it was designed for) becuas3 they do not like the P2P spendable nature that Bitcoin is.
Definitely part of it. However, you can pour your life into building, but if others don’t deem your work worthy of value it’s just a personal art project.
Yes exactly, which is why the best builders win.
