That would be useful, but he's hinting at the fact that some people's reposts are high-signal... and some people's aren't. And that individual users are the best judge of what is high-signal.
Discussion
My algorithm already uses YOUR follows, so that signal has already been curated by the DVM user
Some people follow hundreds or thousands of people and would like to see the reposts from 10 of them.
My point being that your algo should be the default because anything else is just irritating to the user, but that a possibility for additional curation can be accomodated.
Perhaps with a list, even, so that they have it available in any client or it could be accounted for by curation relays like filter.wine.
Ive been honking this horn for weeks.
nostr:note1aej3d6n9twm7y8vgvq8dq5aahhy0wkc900xpdh8n8a7rsxm0msdspyrf85
nostr:note1t0yse9vfxu6umeynaeeamk7wxqqlwsxuxw6x6eag5dmw05z7g38q4kcfje
nostr:note1za8gapacw9l2r6eqxljpx478r8vgfsd3uxe3qkh7k424sc9nekssyevl7p
Yes, this isn't new.
Web of trusts? No, of course, they’ve been around for decades as a digital concept and for millennia as a societal byproduct
I meant subscription WoT filters, like wine or some clients have.
The only novelty here would be additional arguments for customizing a subscription.