That's how you see it. That's fine. But... You did something that can, and, IMO, will be abused, especially as nostr grows. This is the kind of thing that will allow people to be more "influencer-like" which isn't what I want to see here. I like it here because things were mostly permanent. Long time preference is a much better frame of mind than being able to "correct" things and spin them off in weird directions.

Again, you're obviously free to do what you want. But, I think the way you went about it by changing a fundamental part of the protocol was the wrong thing to do. You could have created a new NIP or worked with one of the already editable parts of the protocol to achieve this end. You chose expedience over compatability.