We are social creatures so we tend to personify most complex systems. But it's not always helpful to personify God/reality. I don't think it makes sense to refer to God as an authority. An infinite, ever-present system that gave rise to all that is, & contains all power & knowledge that exists, isn't really an authority.

I think the reoccuring idea that it is "wrong" to draw or to speak the name of God may be rooted in an effort to keep people from mentally shrinking God down to a dude in the clouds & misunderstanding everything as a result. And also why there are so many names. People were trying to describe or reference the laws or root of an infinitely complex existence, while others who miss the point entirely "follow the letter of the law" rather than the spirit of the meaning, by seeking to punish or chastise people for using God's name in vain or drawing God or whatever.

The point of my post is that there is nothing but natural law (God's law). These natural laws exist in the social realm just as they do in the physical realm. People can work to deny morality (natural law) in the social realm, but there is no way to eliminate the consequences or costs of such a denial of reality. Costs can be shifted around, but they are conserved & nearly always magnified by a sort of friction in the cost shifting process. There is no authority needed, the laws are just always there, always working. People whose actions deny these laws simply make life worse for themselves &/or others. They move humanity away from God, & thus away from heaven & toward hell.

God's law (reality) is the only authority & all human authority is illegitimate except to the degree that it teaches God's law. Only through the recognition of individual rights (recognizing the individual as prime) & refusing to violate those rights can men achieve any legitimate authority. All aggressive, violent, &/or coercive human authority is illegitimate & evil, obedience to such human authority is also evil.