I’m not gonna argue the source viewable vs. FOSS here. I do agree that CK should just stop crying and go full FOSS and not commercial license. My question is what has djuri changed? The BTClock has verbiage on the back of the board saying “BTClock original design by Djuri B.” What is original about it?
Discussion
It isn’t even source viewable
Ok, no Blockclock source viewable code. Great. So are you going to answer any questions I asked?
I did.
They made an open source version of the same device that provides more control to users. If you are so pissed about this, then please stop buying phones because every phone is just a copy of an older design but with improvements.
That’s fine if Djuri wrote the code, mimic’d the Blockclock, and was making his code open source. It would be helpful if the end result didn’t look exactly like the original, I’d like to see something BETTER designed than the Blockclock. I’m not pissed about anything. I’m literally trying to decipher what the difference is between two projects that look very very identical. I already told you what I think about CK claiming source viewable vs FOSS. You interact like someone who has never had to ask a question before, humble yourself a little semisol
Yes, the code is fully independent from anything Coinkite has made.
Gotcha. Thanks for the info and that makes your OP about the situation make sense, thus much more alarming. Taking note on how this plays out and hope Djuri gets his project back up. Cheers
My wording was a bit harsh too and I understand. But overall, this is a pretty disappointing move from Coinkite.
The full, unaltered text of the takedown notice is here:
Great synopsis of the situation. Appreciate your insights to challenge my own. 🤝