Nostr Web Client

Verified account NIP05 is meaningless. I want to know if I have checked who this person is, not that he has paid a website to be called jack. The only real verified are those you decide to follow.

jb55 3y ago 💬 5

I don’t think so. If it was jack@block.xyz or something you would know it’s legit. Mine is jb55@jb55.com …

My only concern with nip05 is that it’s a bit exclusionary, it requires some technical expertise to setup. Hopefully that will get better over time though.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Chad Pleb 3y ago

Vitor Pamplona 3y ago

If you know the domain, yes. But how do you know the domain is spelled correctly? Do you really check every time? Tons of verified fakes right now.

porter 3y ago 💬 1

Yeah. This is why I don’t get the paid verification services popping up. The only way this is valuable is if you verify on your own domain.

Bitcoin Jungle 3y ago

I’m interested in tying NIP-05 verification for a domain to publish abilities on a relay (already supported by nostr-rs-relay). As the spammers arrive, this will help curb that issue among others.

cafe0fed... 3y ago 💬 1

I followed NVK’s guide and got it done in a couple of mins which was great, feels awesome to self verify that easily instead of paying $8 a month 😂 but agreed it’s still too technical for mass adoption, could definitely be made to be simpler though 😎

3866608e... 3y ago

🤙🏼

Cameri🐦‍🔥 3y ago 💬 1

Someone automated NIP-5 for everyone who got verified using nostr.directory

Is that a good thing?

Vitor Pamplona 3y ago

Proof of ID comes from multiple places. Historical context with a Twitter username is one of those places. If people were used to see each person's website all the time, the current NIP-05 would also be useful. A lot of our trust is derived from social validation (followings).