Verified account NIP05 is meaningless. I want to know if I have checked who this person is, not that he has paid a website to be called jack. The only real verified are those you decide to follow.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I don’t think so. If it was jack@block.xyz or something you would know it’s legit. Mine is jb55@jb55.com …

My only concern with nip05 is that it’s a bit exclusionary, it requires some technical expertise to setup. Hopefully that will get better over time though.

$8

If you know the domain, yes. But how do you know the domain is spelled correctly? Do you really check every time? Tons of verified fakes right now.

Yeah. This is why I don’t get the paid verification services popping up. The only way this is valuable is if you verify on your own domain.

I’m interested in tying NIP-05 verification for a domain to publish abilities on a relay (already supported by nostr-rs-relay). As the spammers arrive, this will help curb that issue among others.

I followed NVK’s guide and got it done in a couple of mins which was great, feels awesome to self verify that easily instead of paying $8 a month 😂 but agreed it’s still too technical for mass adoption, could definitely be made to be simpler though 😎

🤙🏼

Someone automated NIP-5 for everyone who got verified using nostr.directory

Is that a good thing?

Proof of ID comes from multiple places. Historical context with a Twitter username is one of those places. If people were used to see each person's website all the time, the current NIP-05 would also be useful. A lot of our trust is derived from social validation (followings).

The domain part is more important than the local part.

this is why we should try our hardest twitter sleuthing skills when handing out verify. if it looks like a bot, don't verify em.. build your trust networkk.

🤙🏼