A thought occured to me just now. In the future, when the block reward is miniscule and the Bitcoin network's miner's revenue comes solely from transaction fees, wouldn't large bag holders have an incentive to mine blocks just to keep their bags secure regardless of whether the transaction fees make it profitable or not? I feel like if Bitcoin is worth enough money then anyone with a significant amount would at least have an incentive to protect their wealth by mining. Am I wrong? I would love to hear what other people think.

#bitcoin

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Not really, why would they? How would that help?

You are both correct and wrong all at the same time.

Like bitcoin, Bitcoin transactions represent absolute scarcity. Block space will fill up and transaction fees will increase long before the block reward is negligible.

At the moment nation states are scrambling to both attract and secure Bitcoin mining capacity… they are securing their ability to transact on the base layer.

These things take time… things set in motion today take time to manifest in the observable universe… like changing direction in a large ship… levers are pushed and pulled long before we see the ship starting to turn.

So, yes you are correct, there could be an incentive there from large bag holders but no you are incorrect as the mempool will be beyond capacity and transaction fees will increase to reflect a player’s desire to settle a transaction.

Thy enemy of thy enemy is thy friend. Bitcoin/Bitcoin is the enemy of the US dollar, USD is thy enemy of every other nation state on the planet. Why do you think we see BRICS forming and growing… has no one noticed, they are an alliance of enemies? (With a common enemy). Has anyone noticed, they have recently started settling international trade in BTC?