either sound money has never existed before bitcoin ( i'm open to that interpretation),

or you mean the past two hundred years of innovation has been fueled by both sound money (gold)

and unsound money (unpegged fiat)

at different times.

Tech has, Despite sound or unsound money meant that innovation is determined by whether or not a new GPU archetecture is 0.01% more efficient than the competitions. Less than 1% of people are interested or work in these niche fields.

I'm not a luddite, i'm simply saying there is a valley between hills. The luddites were right for a time. ATM's created more jobs, i get it, but some, lives , homes, families, were lost along the way never to be found again. Bitcoin, is one technology in a storm of factors leading to the next hill or plateau.

Ignoring the basic factors that lead to the boom bust cycle will just continue, even when/if bitcoinnis the only moneybthat makes sense.

We are in a delicate spot at the moment and i reject completly all narratives that assert bitcoin has already won and is fated.