I'll offer some correction here. Holy Tradition is the revelation of God, and the Scriptures are a subset of such.

Out of oral Tradition (note the capital "T") came written Tradition, which we call the Bible. Jesus himself instructed the apostles, who were sent to baptize all the nations, and to that end did they employ others so write, some writing for themselves (St. John in his gospel and Sts. Peter and Paul in epistles).

It is the Church that made the Bible, not the Bible that makes a church.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

That is intellectual honest and a fair correction exactly because my wording made it look like the letters written produced the tradition.

For a catechetical teaching, I should not have offered that inference.

Hey, that's what conversation is for: spurring each other on toward greater fidelity to Truth

This is exactly the type of difference that makes ecumenism difficult.

The book "History of heresies and their refutations", by Saint Alphonse-Marie de Ligório, is the best source anyone could aim for.

I came for an honest investigative conversation.

The pal has been using ChatGPT because he can't defend his unhinged practices by himself.

Go read "History of heresies and their refutations", by Saint Alphonse-Marie de Ligório.

Now I take my leave.

nostr:nevent1qqs8gh2zw6lz2p8wtxxkr0g9jupg90xqh6pcm06w2pcp80rht28zqrgpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygz5mrus67uxhgcn5zzz8jxhxrgdh4hp0vndk5vxctqvgu7geyfqrupsgqqqqqqsxcq5af

It's not even edited! Hahaha!

If something be of use at least we would have a good exercise of correcting the robot. But all of it is disjuncted and fruitless.

Haha! Tell me about it! Ecumenism is supposed to be the members of the One Church coming together, not many churches. It's a sad reality that Christians are not all united in one cohesive body, but we instead chose to segregate ourselves into opinionated groups.

It only takes intellectual honesty.

Indeed. That's all it took me. It'll be ten years on Thanksgiving day.