I think the most entertaining debate I could have with AnCaps is on "self-ownership". I think self-ownership is a terrible basis for a universal conception of rights, and I reject the arguments by Rothbard et. al. that the metaphysical claim that it represents an objective conception of rights is on terrible epistemic foundations. I want to have this debate with someone who can go deep on this.
Discussion
*I mean, I reject the metaphysical claim *and* I think it's on terrible epistemic foundations.
I'm not an anarcho capitalist but just want to say that "terrible epistemic foundations" is prob the smartest way i ever heard something get called dumb
I disagree this is calling someone dumb. Intelligence and knowledge works atop axioms. Knowing the correct axioms on which to reason is not something where it’s easy to find objective truth.