Digital money failed before Bitcoin (eCash, Bitgold, etc). Should nobody have looked objectively at Bitcoin because there was digital money before? Obviously not. And you’re still approaching this as if Kaspa and Bitcoin are in competition, further demonstrating you haven’t looked.
I didn’t call “us” sheep (I already told you I own more Bitcoin than Kaspa and yet you still use us/them language), I said BTCers are either sheep OR they are objective, critical thinkers. Which you are is up to you.
You don’t know what I know about other coins. I have looked at many many many objectively and I can tell you with certainty that Bitcoin and Kaspa are in a class of their own (not placing them in the same class either).
If you don’t want to learn or challenge ideas, that’s fine, but at least make accurate arguments. But this furthers my point. You’re arguing against something you have no idea what it is.