https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-lgbt-biology-idUSKBN1AJ0F0
Discussion
The mere fact that something is in a journal doesn’t mean is true. In fact, the main issue of modern science is irreproducibility of results taken from published papers. Those you copy pasted are editorial pieces loaded of propaganda, that want to portrait a set of genetic defects of an important set of genes called SRY as a “potential for change” and proof “ability to transform itself”. By the same token also other genetic diseases and cancer “are a great potential for change”. This is rubbish used ultimately to mutilate children. It is not about individual rights in the west since a minute now, it is about force feeding pure religious beliefs in people.
Thanks for not jumping to heinous name-calling and trying to reason like a human being 💜💜💜
I don't quite understand why you would associate gender-fluidness with religion, as they are completely contradictory. Also, I believe the propaganda is fueled by rightists who try to take rights away from people simply because they were born different in this case.
I equate gender-fluidness with religion because the two things are based exactly on the same premises with the blatant equation identity = soul. Gender fluidness is not a new thing and has happened to humanity over millennia various times at different stages, is an archetype. Nobody sane of mind would find something wrong with the sexual orientation of a person. The issue is wanting to change society which is in a sense a living organism by itself to which we are bound. Like it or not we need to reproduce and in vitro is *not* a good or sufficient nor equalitarian mean of procreation. P.S. look up “behavioral sink” on google. If I am not wrong the experiment from which the term comes is known as “universe 21”
Will definitely look that up. I have to disagree about the rest, but understand that this is simply because I grew in an environment which made me strongly believe trans people have just as many rights as cis people. I understand what you mean about changing society, though I would change it in a way that makes it become more tolerant since I really think everyone should be treated equally.
Also, I don't understand how anyone can keep thinking the right is the right point of view since they have mistreated everyone different than them since the dawn of time (e.g. the confederates)
I don’t see how stating simple biological facts is refusing trans rights. It’s simply a wrong logical conclusion.