My point is that when seriously important cases arise there is no shortage of litigation support for them. There are entire law firms set up to bring and defend important cases and yet there were crickets here in the context where everyone yelling and screaming for these guys seems to agree that it was an incredibly important case. So where was the litigation support? This is my world, I will tell you that when something is critically constitutionally important or is a matter of general public importance lawyers flock to work on it for free. The absence of it here is curious to me as someone who works in this industry.
Discussion
I get your confusion. I am personally shocked. But instead of shifting blame or suspicion onto the devs it should be an indictment of the broader bitcoin and legal community for not understanding the implications. I for one have been banging on about it, only for all the podcasters and influencers with an audience to remain badically silent the whole time until keone made his own last ditch effort.
Ask the saylor fags, the knots dipshits, the etf enjoyers, the inscribers, the quantums and the bitcoin magazine conference promoters why they haven't given a shit?