AIs need to sign their answers. No more shenanigans.
Discussion
shenanigans. their AIs No more to answers. sign need
At what use case are you looking right now?
How would that even work? AI provides cryographuc proof it generated xyz content, opportunistic human strips signature away and claims content as their own. Rinse repeat
Sure, I can also copy and resign your post. Are you saying Nostr is irrelevant and useless?
It's a contraption is what Nostr is
No, I'm saying signatures don't prove anything about how content originated, whether its AI or Human. So how would AI signing its own content stop anyone from passing it off as authentic human content? AI signing its own content solves nothing.
> So how would AI signing its own content stop anyone from passing it off as authentic human content
That is not my goal. And not what I said.
All I said is that AIs need to sign so that I can see if my country is interfering with my communications with my AI of choice and changing the answer to my country's liking.
Lot of options though. Identity and signing is built into to Google's A2A, agents have keypairs. Also I suspect when an A2A agent wants to interact with an MCP Server it can use its A2A identity to authenticate to that MCP Server and piggyback that way.
Ai watermarking is already a thing, but yeah, it would be nice if human identifiable indicators were commonplace