Dang y'all be filling up my hard drives with your transactions. :)

#noderunner

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

This made me realize there is a block size paradox. Bigger blocks devalue the chain reducing the TX count such that the big block forks have smaller blocks on average than the real deal with a limit on blocksize.

Smaller block limits will limit the block size so blocks must be smaller even if there is more demand.

So, it is not possible to create larger blocks by changing chain rules. You can only make the blocks smaller.

nostr:nevent1qqs2m600658th4e343l4kucel4ktvpxx0mdeluxxx660guh9d656rxsppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgsqxefne258ydmfgm2wfl02fsdqgs0d5wx29kweg9amxcqxew4t7kqrqsqqqqqp464g6a

Harddrive? Glad I skipped that. Went from mSD to...

(incus container, it has to share its place with other stuff untill I find either a bigger nvme or put more servers in the rack o.o)

Redundant SSD arrays are quite the expense to be filling up with block data that is almost never read.

Fair; but going from literal seconds for btcd to do anything to going instantaneous actions felt so good. xD

Might actually just use a SATA SSD. Though seektimes on HDDs... idk if I'd put it there o.o

XD Yeah I suppose. I'm not doing anything worth that kind of speed yet.