We have to make sure it’s accessible (i.e. port the projects to easy jump off points for noobs, like nostr:nprofile1qqs9df4h2deu3aae83fmet5xmrlm4w5l9gdnsy3q2n7dklem7ezmwfc6c32nl and nostr:nprofile1qqsw5t3us9xs3gmclzjm37hvk2yy6pv9t96utjjttsj794hexc5x79qzl2gvy) to ensure power features are there for non-IT-inclined, self-sovereign folks, that don’t want to be forced into a walled relay garden to use a good nostr client.
yes, for now the clients are mostly built by people tied to opensats, jack and HRF and they all have some particular in-group agenda, but this is slowly changing
too much asking permission going on, this has to change, and once some people start doing it and proving better things work better at that point we should be asking the question does this protocol need gatekeepers or does it need a set of cultural norms, idioms, etiquette and obligations
they call it human rights foundation but they literally think that things like internet access and using nostr are "human rights" even though i gotta eat and pay rent so i can code (me and the rest of the devs) which is why i doubt they have any interest in actually doing it right, which is sad because that also means DMs are not going to be fixed by anyone they are funding, for sure nobody has yet!
