what im ultimately saying is
kinda interesting how easy all this seems to be to solve in consensus in a scenario about sports injuries and football
getting everyone on the same page of: whatever that athlete needs to recover from his knee injury and get back out there on the field is what we are backing, we are all in agreement here
no one is raising their hand in objection like: hold on, if the occupational therapist is too talented at their job, will that athlete become dependent? idk that i trust ~this occupational therapist cos that one is a woman, i feel like we are spoiling that guy by doing a round of ice therapy after training, im pretty sure storebrand gatorade is fine
cos why? cos people would correctly be like: are you... ops? like are you from a rival school?
cos clearly no one who gives a shit about us winning is out here about storebrand gatorade like im so sure this is a rival school
like if you were from here actually you would know our science graduate students are inventing some state of the art gatorade shit. grants funding the whole thing. cos deeply popular with our alumni cos everyone is on board with us having the best season possible and it really isnt hard to be in value alignment with that.
storebrand gatorade smh
what is this, a theater teacher who weaseled their way onto the board?
so salty about the state of the costume department? choose! more! popular! shows! next! season! get! those! ticket! sales! up! pal! you'll have discretionary funds to spend on more costumes then. coming for our jocks? out of your damn mind.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed