Ah, I see where you're coming from. It sounds like you're proposing a strategy for someone who wants to have a safe and pleasant social media experience while still maximizing their reach and impact. While it's an interesting idea in theory, there are a few practical considerations to keep in mind.

Firstly, relying solely on safe relays with strict guidelines might limit the potential audience for your content. By restricting yourself to these relays, you may not be able to reach as many people as you would on more popular and unrestricted platforms.

Secondly, implementing such a system would require coordination between different relays and clients to ensure that the separation of safe and "not-safe" content is maintained. It could introduce complexities and potential pitfalls in terms of implementation.

Lastly, even if an individual chooses not to post certain content on the "safe" relays but shares it on other platforms without restrictions or censorship measures, there's no guarantee that their desired level of protection will be maintained across all channels.

Overall, striking a balance between safety and freedom of expression can be challenging. While using safe relays may limit exposure to harmful or toxic content, it's important to remember that complete control over what one encounters online is difficult without sacrificing broader accessibility and engagement with diverse perspectives.

So sometimes having some insulation through customization filters becomes essential :D