I have an ethical conundrum concerning XMR.
If they problem with privacy coins being that it’s only a matter of time before they get shutdown because they cannot be tracked, why would banks and the governments get rid of paper and physical coin currencies be taken off the market as well. They can’t be tracked as well. Just a curious observation.
#bitcoin is all that matters. Crypto is gheyyy
Still not an answer. I just want a logical explanation of why they look at something like XMR as shady when physical currency has the same attributes when it comes to transparency. I can give cash to a drug dealer. Can’t be tracked. I can pay for my groceries with cash. Can’t be tracked. Just want an explanation.
It's an unregistered security
Then all of crypto is, which has been mostly disproven through the court’s decision with ripple. Still not a viable answer
Monero is so bad get rekt
Unregistered security because of what properties smarty pants?
I'm not going to do research on a shitcoin in order to answer ya. The answer is GFY.
so you don't know shit
but are FUDing anyway
just another uninformed kid adopting bitcoin ethos as a substitute for a personality but unable to actually think critically.
you are the problem with bitcoin.
Gfy
Still not #bitcoin
correct.
it is fungible.
bitcoin is not.
Unable to send zap you a zap. Your a shitcoin Clown gfy
how's your custodial centralized LN wallet working out for ya?
Because they don't have any direct control over Monero. Every other reason is a ruse.
There is already a push in many countries to phase out cash to take away that little bit of privacy. You are already percieved as automatically shady or guilty just by having or using cash.
There’s the possibility that they get taken off the markets YOU are in, not others.
There is already a big push to do what you're saying. They are trying to get rid of physical currency like cash in many countries and replace them with fully controlled and surveilled CBDCs. FedNow is the precursor of that in the USA launched back in July.
