Slippery slope.

Charge a fee to cover costs. Make the service so good that’s it’s worth the SATS fee.

Expecting zaps to cover isn’t sustainable.

Also never forget about the lowest common denominator. People will and are taking advantage of the “free SATS” model; i.e. taking & not giving.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Correct. There’s literally thousands of bots that posted on Nostr this morning “Hello World #introduction”.

Many new accounts get zapped because we are nice and want to educate folks, but sats are lost to that shit.

I see these tests as positive because it pushes open source software to become better in self sufficient ways. Newbies become collateral damage for basic scams though.

💯💯💯🎯🎯⚡️⚡️

I typically only zap the accounts I’m sure of.

Most zaps to the builders and they’re verified builders.

Real content and builders 💯💯

You wanna zap attack a dev with me?

Like a 1000 sats broken up into several smaller payments?