So, USDT on Lightning vs Cashu USD.

As far as I understand, USDT is backed by various assets and is centrally controlled — nothing changes here. Lightning is just a new transport layer.

Cashu USD is backed by BTC held by the mint. BUT: if there’s no over-collateralization and USD eCash tokens are issued at the market rate, then the mint takes a risk which it should mitigate by selling BTC received for actual USD (or for LN-USDT). Equally, when a user wants to redeem eCash USD, the mint has to buy BTC that it will send to the user.

Do I understand it correctly?

nostr:nprofile1qqs9pk20ctv9srrg9vr354p03v0rrgsqkpggh2u45va77zz4mu5p6ccytv72v nostr:nprofile1qqsvxhlccdqyf8cddzh34mzggja5f2wqhrqa6n6dfmauvhsjqwdrfzs6a72r9

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.