If they are already on nostr in don't think it is rude.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I might do that, then. Maybe they aren't looking at GitWorkshop because no one was posting in their repo, there, and they lost interest.

I am trying to slowly move over to gitworkshop, since its going to be so much better than github mostly because users don't have to create an account to open or share an issue

however I wont respond to any of the issues there until it implements NIP-22. Its ideological but I don't like kind 1 being used as the reply kind :)

Is that the generic reply kind? Why clients support notifications for that?

*which. I realise that typo changes the meaning of the question.

none yet. but I'm planning on adding support for it in noStrudel for replying to articles and wiki pages, so that will be at least one client

This is the challenge. Clients aren't incentivesd to support it because most clients don't publish with it. Clients don't publish with it because most clients don't support it. Catch 22.

A catch 22 is still better than using kind 1 for everything :)

If nothing else then I will try to break the catch 22 with noStrudel

Should we all just use the NIP-22 generic comment thing?

I would love to see a future where we reply to kind 1 notes with NIP-22 replies, then pulling the "default" social feed of kind 1 notes would be so much cleaner

but transitioning to that will take some time and coordination on the part of clients

We need NIP-22 for our books and gitstuff. Don't want everyone replaying with kind 01s, but that's all there is, now.