People don’t feel the “need” of a leader or a judge, most of the time people don’t have the willingness to be responsible and/or have the power and connections to be in those roles those roles.
The use of Nostr, as of today implies the user has certain level of education, interest and patience to set it up. Because it’s clearly harder than making a tick-tock/google/instagram account, where everything works well the majority of the time.
That proof of work, to make a Nostr key pair, with the lack of general content compared to other social networks, are the reason why adoption lacks.
When you said “most of humanity doesn’t MATCH…” I felt that should be considered in the opposite way, what doesn’t yet match is the protocol and clients to the needs and responsibilities that most users have or are willing to take.
I don't think everyone is created equal. Do you?
Depends what you mean by created… generally I see the uniqueness in people.
I mean that in an evolutionary sense, not everyone has the capacity to do more difficult things.
I think is not about the capacity of people, even though that is an important factor.
Take the email protocol as an example, it would have been extremely difficult to see it so massively expanded as it it today, when the protocol was starting to being used in the 80’s.
The technology was adapted, and that created massive adoption, outside geeks and nerds, with high capabilities.
Yeah. But I think adoption is not the most important goal. It is quite nice, in fact, that the influencers and mass is not here.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed