Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Neal

in the post, u use categorization, syntax, semantics, all outgrowths of order itself

the order that subatomic particles follow: no logicially valid argument for how that came to be materialistcally

materialism can only go as far as random chaos, if u are trying to explain any order beyond that, ur reliant upon the immaterial

to even say “the apple is on the table” relies upon the immaterial.

it’s an objective fact

and it doesn’t fit with materialism

Avatar
vinney...axkl 10mo ago

Why do we need to answer "how it came to be?" rather than content ourselves with "how it works?"

What does the former question get you?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.