Perhaps through their efforts here: https://www.habitat.org/stories/6-facts-about-habitats-sustainability-efforts
Discussion
Though the court filing itself is about the Climate United Fund.
Also in this case the relation between bank and government is more tight than normal. It seems these organizations got a free (or easier to open?) bank account from Citi via the government.
Which potentially made it easier to not just stop subsidies from going to the organizations (DOGE style), but also to freeze these accounts.
So the lesson here is: pick your Uncle Jim wisely. Don't trust the hand that feeds you. Brush the gifted horse mouth?
I'm also somewhat surprised that Citi can just disclose an ongoing FBI criminal investigation like this - but we live in a strange timeline.
If they had their own independent bank account it would take a lot more than a "recommendation" to shut an account down. And it doesn't help when your bank explicitly doesn't owe you a fiduciary responsibility.
But Bitcoin doesn't fix this. If the goal of the government was to retain control over funds even after they were distributed, they would just use multisig. Neither does e-cash because lack of privacy from the government was the explicit goal.
Blame Congress.
Oh I saw this on Nebula yesterday (with a less click bait title) and just realized it's about the same topic.