Censorship is not an option.
clients, specially open source clients, SHOULD have opinions.
And if you don't agree with them you fork and write your opinions like nostr:npub1t0nyg64g5vwprva52wlcmt7fkdr07v5dr7s35raq9g0xgc0k4xcsedjgqv did with Amethyst!
That's open source software doing what it's supposed to do!
Discussion
Censorship is innevitably an option. And we the users have the option of rejecting that censorship. Such is the nature of open source protocols.
yup
Those who advocate for censorship outside of illegality are advocating for the violation of others human rights and deserve whatever happens to them as a consequence.
Its easy to fix bugs in code. Its impossible to anticipate all the societal effects that your algorithms will have even though you implemented them to solve a specific problem. Its entirely naïve to expect developers to address or solve them all. Its an iterative process between the users and developers, one best walked without assuming malintent.