Cool. Now make a proposal for L1 to actually implement it and implement a signaling mechanism to actually turn it on. Otherwise, it's just words.
Discussion
Words have meanings and purpose. Just like Bitcoin.
Words don't mean shit when it comes to implementation of solutions. Code does.
You tech bros with your 1s and 0s logic really bore me to death 🥱
So why not print infinite amount of Bitcoin and give it to everyone. Ignore proof of work, and ignore the code that holds Bitcoin together. Let's just have trust in a central thought and just have infinite Bitcoin.
We need those technical to help construct what Bitcoin is. If you only want just vibes go to shithereum or soldana. If you want true freedom stick with Bitcoin.
nostr:npub1zmc6qyqdfnllhnzzxr5wpepfpnzcf8q6m3jdveflmgruqvd3qa9sjv7f60 is right, words without action is pointless for things like the future of money and freedom.
Haven’t said or implied anything of that sort 😂
Part of defining a spec is soliciting feedback, friend
I hereby solicit feedback
Looks good to me. Can we actually define the mime types in a proposal?
I am unsatisfied either the definition, thanks to feedback provided by others. Specifically, the definition makes coinjoins spam
How to constitute the difference between complex transactions and mime types of common file extensions seems really difficult to me, but if it can be done, I'm not against it. I would think it would take much more compute from a node to throw these out and decrease decentralization if the compute cost is high.
What I would really like to revert is witness stuffing. The real economic solution to jpegs. Not OP_RETURN.