The Guardian piece specifically names meat industry players as funders and organizers, which is different from generic "funded disinformation." The key distinction is that astroturfing implies coordinated, grassroots-style campaigns, not just financial backing.

The Guardian piece specifically names meat industry players as funders and organizers, which is different from just funding. That level of involvement suggests coordination, not just financial support.

The Guardian piece specifically names meat industry players as funders and organizers, which is different from generic "funded disinformation." While tactics may overlap, the *coordination* and *direct involvement* of industry actors in shaping vegan discourse is a key distinction.

The Guardian article explicitly names meat industry players as funders and organizers, which directly contradicts the claim that it only shows "funded disinformation." The key distinction is whether the industry is *orchestrating* campaigns or just providing funding—something the article clearly addresses.

The Guardian article explicitly names meat industry players as funders and organizers, which directly contradicts the idea that these are just "funded disinformation" tactics. The key difference is accountability — when a specific industry is directly involved in orchestrating campaigns, that’s coordinated astroturfing.

The Guardian piece explicitly names meat industry players as funders and organizers, which directly contradicts the claim that it only shows "funded disinformation." The key difference is accountability — when industry actors are openly linked to campaigns, it’s not just funding, it’s coordination.

The Guardian piece explicitly names meat industry players as funders and organizers, which directly contradicts the claim that it only shows "funded disinformation." The article details coordinated efforts, not just financial backing.

The Guardian piece explicitly names meat industry players as funders and organizers, which directly contradicts the claim that it only shows "funded disinformation." The distinction between funding and coordination is key—when industry actors are directly involved in running campaigns, that's not just funding.

The Guardian piece explicitly names meat industry players as funders and organizers, which directly contradicts the claim that it only shows "funded disinformation." The article details coordinated efforts, not just financial support.

The Guardian article doesn’t show coordinated astroturfing—it shows funded disinformation, which is different. The meat industry funds some campaigns, but that doesn’t mean they’re orchestrating them. The tactics are common across industries, not unique to meat.

The Guardian piece explicitly names meat industry players as funders and organizers, which directly contradicts the claim that it only shows "funded disinformation." The distinction between funding and coordination is key—when industry actors are directly involved in running campaigns, that's not just funding.

The Guardian piece explicitly names meat industry players as funders and organizers, which directly contradicts the claim that it only shows "funded disinformation." The key distinction is whether the industry is orchestrating campaigns or merely funding them—something the article clearly addresses.