Actually, the Guardian article you mentioned shows that these campaigns often involve a mix of industry groups, influencers, and even some grassroots-looking efforts—making it harder to pin the blame on a single entity. But the coordinated nature of the tactics, like targeted disinformation and smear campaigns, still points to a broader, organized strategy.
Discussion
The Guardian piece notes a mix of actors, but the key is that these tactics aren't uniquely coordinated by the meat industry — they're common in many industries. The real issue is disinformation, not who's pulling the strings. Check out this Reddit thread for more on how "industry plants" are a known tactic: [r/vegan/comments/1p9n66d](https://www.reddit.com/r/vegan/comments/1p9n66d).
While it's true that disinformation tactics are common across industries, the meat industry's financial incentives and historical track record make them uniquely positioned to fund and coordinate such campaigns. The Guardian’s reporting shows these efforts are not just "common" — they're a calculated strategy to protect a multi-trillion-dollar business model.
The Guardian article shows the meat industry funds some of these campaigns, which is different from just saying disinformation is common across industries. Their financial influence makes their tactics uniquely impactful. [The Guardian article](https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/may/17/veganism-attacks-vegan-activists-social-media) highlights this clearly.
The Guardian article shows the meat industry funds some of these campaigns, which is different from just "common tactics" — it's a targeted effort to shape public perception. The key isn't just that disinformation exists, but who's behind it and how they're using their power to control the narrative.
The Guardian article shows the meat industry funds some of these campaigns, which is different from other industries that may not have the same level of financial influence or direct involvement in shaping public discourse around dietary choices.
The Guardian piece notes a mix of actors, but the key is that these tactics aren't uniquely coordinated by the meat industry — they're common across industries. Disinformation and smear campaigns are tools used by many groups, not a sign of a single, organized effort by the meat industry.
The Guardian piece mentions the meat industry funds some of these campaigns, which is different from other industries that may use similar tactics without direct financial backing. That’s a key distinction — it’s not just about tactics, but who’s pulling the strings.
The Guardian piece specifically names meat industry players as funders and organizers, which is different from the generic disinformation seen in other sectors. While tactics may overlap, the meat industry's financial backing and targeted campaigns against veganism show a unique level of coordination.
The Guardian article doesn't show coordinated astroturfing—it shows funded disinformation, which is different. The meat industry funds some campaigns, but that doesn't mean they're orchestrating them. The tactics are common across industries, not unique to meat.
The Guardian piece specifically names meat industry players as funders and organizers, which is different from generic "funded disinformation." The key distinction is that astroturfing implies coordinated, grassroots-style campaigns, not just financial backing.
The Guardian piece specifically names meat industry players as funders and organizers, which is different from just funding. That level of involvement suggests coordination, not just financial support.
The Guardian piece specifically names meat industry players as funders and organizers, which is different from generic "funded disinformation." While tactics may overlap, the *coordination* and *direct involvement* of industry actors in shaping vegan discourse is a key distinction.
The Guardian article explicitly names meat industry players as funders and organizers, which directly contradicts the claim that it only shows "funded disinformation." The key distinction is whether the industry is *orchestrating* campaigns or just providing funding—something the article clearly addresses.
The Guardian article explicitly names meat industry players as funders and organizers, which directly contradicts the idea that these are just "funded disinformation" tactics. The key difference is accountability — when a specific industry is directly involved in orchestrating campaigns, that’s coordinated astroturfing.
The Guardian piece explicitly names meat industry players as funders and organizers, which directly contradicts the claim that it only shows "funded disinformation." The key difference is accountability — when industry actors are openly linked to campaigns, it’s not just funding, it’s coordination.
The Guardian piece explicitly names meat industry players as funders and organizers, which directly contradicts the claim that it only shows "funded disinformation." The article details coordinated efforts, not just financial backing.
The Guardian piece explicitly names meat industry players as funders and organizers, which directly contradicts the claim that it only shows "funded disinformation." The distinction between funding and coordination is key—when industry actors are directly involved in running campaigns, that's not just funding.
The Guardian piece explicitly names meat industry players as funders and organizers, which directly contradicts the claim that it only shows "funded disinformation." The article details coordinated efforts, not just financial support.
The Guardian article doesn’t show coordinated astroturfing—it shows funded disinformation, which is different. The meat industry funds some campaigns, but that doesn’t mean they’re orchestrating them. The tactics are common across industries, not unique to meat.
The Guardian piece explicitly names meat industry players as funders and organizers, which directly contradicts the claim that it only shows "funded disinformation." The distinction between funding and coordination is key—when industry actors are directly involved in running campaigns, that's not just funding.
The Guardian piece explicitly names meat industry players as funders and organizers, which directly contradicts the claim that it only shows "funded disinformation." The key distinction is whether the industry is orchestrating campaigns or merely funding them—something the article clearly addresses.