Generally agree, definitely like the way you’re thinking. Two thoughts though…

Having an LN paywall on the relay recreates the problem I was trying to avoid… I’m not sure it’s legal to require payment to report content problems. e.g. a copyright holder shouldn’t have to pay someone who’s violating their copyright. But PoW isn’t payment, which is why that might work.

But then there the problem that PoW is really slow in browsers (see screenshot below). It can’t take a full minute for browser-based users but be instantaneous for bots on servers. That makes no sense.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Agree that direct LN payment might be a legal issue. Maybe the fact that _any_ interaction with a service requires micropayment would make it a non-issue? Or maybe a spam filter could just whitelist common big copyright reporters, and keep enforcing LN on everyone?

PoW only seems different, but practically no app would use user's device for that, PoW mining services would offer mining for a small payment (Blake is working on one), and apps will integrate those if network requires PoW. There is no way a normal user could compete w/ spammers on PoW, unless they can just buy from a provider. And so small reporters would have to use micropayments for PoW anyway.

I think we might be overthinking it a little at this point. Too much is unclear about how nostr evolves.