"Utility of physical violence "

Go straight to hell

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

There are people who will do violence against you to take what you have, and if you do not possess the means to resist with violence, you will become a victim. Pretending this is not true is childish and ignores nature.

nostr:npub1p5ryszcvdca78jdp5ewhu67zpyfz042m7nrha6mqx7a8wakrqrkqre5ksj nostr:npub15c3rmcmcafw645z4w7u8e8q8akjpk9cmqfr95mnyl86r2m6xqfdsluh6re

I got it, it's human nature to protect yourself and what is yours. You need to have the means nessesary to fend off attackers and what not otherwise you will be enslaved slaughtered or stolen from.

Just hate that therm "utility on violence" it fucks with me. Just because you can be violent does not mean you should. Violence is and should only be nessesary as a defense. To inflict violence upon another for your your entertainment or to derive your power, is weakness.

Yes πŸ’―

My point was you can't secure your property rights in your land and resources either as an individual or as a nation with a bunch of computers calculating hashes. You need guns for that. Jason Lowery's Soft War premise is absurd.