Bitcoin Core has been co-opted. They favor scammy span on the blockchain. They are getting paid by shitcoiners to damage Bitcoin. Bitcoin Knots nodes reject spam.
Discussion
Your answer hasn't been helpful, as it's full of emotional rhetoric, and I don't see any information in your answer.
Are you trying to say "Knots has a zero-byte limit on OP_RETURN?". That's the kind of answer that would be helpful
I sense you're playing games.
You and I have never interacted before, and you don't know who I am. I just asked for practical details of what the differences are. E.g. do they have different op-return limits?
It seems to be common in Bitcoin to announce "Bitcoin core has been co-opted", such as during the BCH arguments. This tells me nothing, other than you dislike Core.
I want facts, as I will be forming my own opinion.
Listen to Matthew Kratter's Bitcoin University viddie on YT. He dopes it out in full detail.
I've seen enough videos on that channel. I pretty much agree with him, but he also wastes a lot of time in his videos ranting
And I don't like the dumb video titles and thumbnails:
This is a dumb part of one of those videos
Why would miners follow Cores direction on this?
There are other problems with the video, but I'll keep watching
Kratter is a trader, relying upon him for technical explanations is quite foolhardy.
Knots nodes still accept "spam," they only delay their acceptance of it to their own detriment.