Feel free to skip the ad hominem and address how making it so large blobs of contiguous CSAM is not a significant risk to Bitcoin.

Appealing to authority is not a good reason to support spam. Learned nothing from Covid

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Kratter is the one doing ad hominem my guy. The whole point is there isn’t a technical argument being put forth.

Hate to break it to you, already on chain, no new risk, and possible to do 400kb today.

Because the corrupted compromised Core devs allowed inscription spam by rejecting Luke's fix.

Hate to break it to you but its fixed in Bitcoin Knots.

nostr:nevent1qqsp8xcjfzwnj8huaymzr0s033h94gp8ha43vef55nsdspg3f2nnw2gppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy08wumn8ghj7mn0wd68yttsw43zuam9d3kx7unyv4ezumn9wshsz8thwden5te0dehhxarj9e3xjarrda5kuetj9eek7cmfv9kz7e4vc5c

That isn’t how bitcoin works, you should get a refund on your bitcoin university tuition.

With corrupting and compromising Core devs? Its good you admit it.

We run Bitcoin Knots instead 🤙

Let me know if you want to bet of the efficacy of knots has on filtering transactions across the network.

We will see it in real time : ), no need to bet.

You're proud that core is destroying any chance of preventing spam? Why does that seem to make you happy?

The Chian it's on is a fork....

lol it’s like we never saw Lopp’s article on Luke

The technical argument :

Allowing spam on the blockchain makes it more expensive to run a node.

It also creates the potential for bad actors to share child abuse material malware and other harmful stuff which would make it illegal to run a bitcoin node in most places.