GM βοΈ PV π€
One of the drawbacks of follow packs is the inability to vet each individual user on the merit of their commentary before deciding to follow them.
For example, I seem to have picked up a handful of Monero drones somewhere, and that had to be corrected immediately.
Gm D
Also, ability to request addition through the pack interface itself would be nice.
GM n PV Daniel !
βοΈβοΈβοΈ
GM π«
Yes, this π
Gm Pv
The fud increases exponentially as sovereignty in feed decreases.....
This is the way of the algo
That's the definition of user error...
you can preview all the posts from users of a follow pack on the follow pack's page!
Web of trust overlay to filter the packs. ππ» Show me only the subset of a pack which passes my WoT threshold.
I def want to do this with Brainstorm once I address some backend database problems. Only show Follow Packs from users whose GrapeRank scores are above some threshold. And if multiple users create Follow Packs on the same topic, then combine them to create a composite Follow Pack curated by your Grapevine, similarly to the way that Brainstorm (still in alpha) currently uses GrapeRank scores to generate composite, Grapevine-curated NIP-56 reports:
PageRank can also be used to filter the packs
nostr:npub1kpt95rv4q3mcz8e4lamwtxq7men6jprf49l7asfac9lnv2gda0lqdknhmz ?
cc nostr:npub176p7sup477k5738qhxx0hk2n0cty2k5je5uvalzvkvwmw4tltmeqw7vgup
Oh yeah, I wrote about it some time ago https://vertexlab.io/blog/pagerank_as_filter/
