Replying to Avatar HoloKat

A few reason not to have algorithms in nostr:

1. Higher signal from people you follow.

Without algos, you have to be selective about who you follow, and you’re more likely to curate that group of people often. Since content is not surfaced via some relational query, you just see what your circle posts.

Nostr without algorithms also resembles life more closely than other social networks. You have to literally be online to see what someone said. Sleeping? You may miss their note unless it is not buried enough that you can go back to it, or if they mention you directly. I think anything that more closely resembles real life interactions is ultimately healthier for us.

Of course that doesn’t mean you’ll miss everything. If the note is great, enough people will like or zap it that sorting can still surface it for you when you are back.

2. Better relationships from smaller number of direct connections. If the Dunbar’s number is to be trusted, we are limited at 150 people with whom we can maintain social connections. Without algos and curation of people you follow, you are more likely to form stronger connections. This in turn makes the network feel more intimate and friendly. Even as we speak I follow 178 people and it feels just about right.

3. Ability to step away without being punished. At least on Twitter, anecdotal evidence suggests that if you step away, your reach diminishes and you have to “earn” it back. Without algos on Nostr you don’t need to worry about this. Just step away as long as you need to - better overall for mental health. Come back when you like and you’ll still reach everyone who follows you. This is exactly how real life works - you enter a room of people and they will all hear you instead of a tiny fraction.

While other social networks optimize for engagement and time spent on website, I think nostr should optimize for maximum mental health and least stress.

Curious to hear ya’ll thoughts…

Ainda não entendo pq temos o “like” se hj temos o ZAP

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Some people use likes as an acknowledgment of having read a note. It doesn’t mean they agree with it, just sort of nodding to let you know they heard you.

Very true

[782887]

Com a opção de editar o Zap para valores simbólicos como o tradicional 21 Sats não faz diferença e evitaria robôs dando like para manipular resultados de engajamento

Zaps are easy to manipulate too. But besides that fact, most majority of users don’t have wallets connected last I checked, and have no way of expressing liking or acknowledging having read a thing. They might just leave if it’s not there where they’d expect it.

Agora entendi… faz sentido!

How cool is it that we’re having a conversation in different languages!

Isso muda tudo, tbm acho incrível!

This is the best. Tower of Babel

So interesting, was that in your dream from sleeping?

👀

Percebi, mesmo com tradução, a forma de se expressar oriental usa muitas metáforas difíceis de ser compreendidas pelo ocidente!

东方人彼此之间也看不懂,比如我大概只能读懂一半翻译成中文后的日语。

True but it’s sometimes enough to get the gist of what is being communicated.

O Chinês em alguns momentos parece poesia… com o avanço das AIs espero um tradutor de metáforas ou verbetes de cultura local 😅

すごいな~

Yes!!!

#[4]​ achamos o seu irmão perdido!

Mesmo assim um zap e um like pela resposta.. 🙂👍