The ordinal debate essentially boils down to whether you think these transactions are legitimate economic activity, or spam that harms all other participants on the network.

I'll tell you which camp I land in, but first:

What say you?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Just one sat, or as strongly as we feel?

I limited it to 100 sats max, but the stronger you feel, the more value you will put into expressing your opinion about it IMO.

Polls with more than one sat per vote kind of turn into a wishy-washy mess.

In my experience this ordinal bs is making it expensive to put my sats in cold storage.

I say that if people think they can prevent others from inserting arbitrary data into Bitcoinโ€™s blockchain an unpleasant surprise awaits.

I donโ€™t care about ordinals. Just stating that policing what other people do or not do is not my thing (and will never be) and it basically is a foolโ€™s errand.

Never spent a minute thinking about ordinals

Spam that will be sorted out, eventually

I think is legit but at the same time a service/miner can reject it

Fine, if someone wants to spend their precious stored time on ordinals then let them. Miners are awarded and I can wait a bit longer putting my sats to cold storage.

Now that y'all voted I'll share my 2 sats:

I believe that anything that deviates from the use case of permissionless P2P digital cash is spam and should not be permitted to consume scarce block space.

There are other networks like ethereum that can be used for storing jpegs.

nostr:nevent1qqst9twt97wc8vyes68fn7ffggh8w0kmn2yk8fqgxy5vu2800q4yangpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfdupzqrgxfq9scm3mu0y6rfja0e4uyzgjyl24hax80m4kqda6wamvxq8vqvzqqqqm8ymcrqd7

Legitimate spam

You'll still get a certain type of bitcoiner polling here. Nostr is kinda for maxi's at the moment, so they will lean in the direction of spam

Yeah I'm not asking the degenerates in the comments under this post: https://twitter.com/udiWertheimer/status/1731891648085274664

Take their bitcoin, smile, tic tock next block

the ability to embed text messages in transactions is a powerful one

ordinals are but a branch of the immense use cases this presents, and considering ordinals as spam builds a dangerous precedent

anyway that's up to the miners whether to include that TX or not (correct me if I'm wrong)