Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar cloud fodder

also, in an effort to describe my thought patterns here. nip42 auth, and a relay, .. can control read access to a relay. maintain a list of people that can do this, if they take and republish all the notes.. then what? is it a problem?

if so, then maybe people dont want to use their 'main key' in the group, for plausable deniability, right?

the thing about nostr that is different, is the signatures and the portability. so privacy in a sense, is more scary because.. you signed an artifact that is portable and have to trust your group not to leak it.

this is where atlas shrugs and im not sure what it all means.. do we just stop publishing signatures or some other tricks? maybe. but then trust inside the group falls to the relay or community admin.

Avatar
ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 9mo ago

tombstones are your friend

they identify the content, without revealing the content, and specify that the content is DED

and further, step outside of the dumb relay mindset, and think about a chanserv bot for this situation. it can keep tombstones of deleted data for a long time, they are not big data compared to what they refer to, and nobody can republish them

#realy already uses tombstones... i haven't written the GC for it yet but they already have timestamps

RIP

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.