Really good article in that you agree with the author’s critique of Keller and defense of homesteading? What about it particularly resonated with you?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yes, I agreed with JD’s critique of Keller. I also think that being a city dweller keeps you focused on work and consumption. I also like JD’s writing style, very easy to read and enjoyable.

I’m not familiar with Keller’s “Theology of the cities,” but I’ve benefited from his books and sermons. So I felt inclined to defend Keller as I read the article. But the author’s critique may be justified.

I was also put off by the author’s writing style. One too many cheap shots. Ex. Sliding in a comment that Keller “was so pretentious” because he spelled civilization the British way is irrelevant.

Worse is the exaggerated and baseless claim that Keller worshipped cities: “Cities, of the type that Keller worshipped, are no type and shadow of the New Jerusalem to come.”

Maybe there’s some entertainment/rhetorical value to the author’s writing style, particularly if you’re predisposed against Keller and cities? 🤷‍♂️

But I did appreciate the author’s reflections on the virtues of homesteading. I’m not a city dweller, so I’m inclined to agree.

The subtitle of the post reads: “If you are watching closely enough, you'll see the Holy Ghost blowing his breath away from the cities. Follow Him.”

We should follow the Lord and go wherever He is calling us. It could be the country. It could be a town or city. It could be a foreign land. We’re pilgrims and people need to hear (and see) the gospel wherever they live.