Nostr Web Client

> proper discussion group

Yes, por favor!

really needs a minimal pairing of a relay-selective kind-1 client and a simple way for write permissions to be set up that doesn't bleed over into other clients (so, a special admin permissions based list), and yes, a relay that also understands this scheme

#realy and #jumble could be a good combo for this

gonna of course be thinking about it more, try and figure out a plan

nostr:npub10npj3gydmv40m70ehemmal6vsdyfl7tewgvz043g54p0x23y0s8qzztl5h is building a nice terminal based nip-17 chat client, perhaps we can come up with a plan

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Niel Liesmons 10mo ago

This sounds like the communities I'm building for.

For proper NIPs publishing and discussions, you at least need:

:wiki: Wikis for the actual NIPs (that can be targeted at the concerning communities)

:thread: Forum-like posts/threads

:chat: Chat

Having all other content types + zaps as a byproduct is great.

Wikis of the NIPs should then probably also be indexed in a 30040 event (type: documentation) to be rendered and organised properly.

ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 10mo ago

yep, that's the general overview of what #gitcitadel is for

from the beginning it has been about opening up the discussion, i think you would have to be completely retarded to think that the current nips repo and cadre of nip guardians are doing this the right way

for a start, most of them are literally not server developers, so letting them dictate protocol seems like a really silly idea to me