Daryn, I completely understand your perspective. To me, and hopefully to others as well, "value for value" does not equate to paying whatever you want.
I believe that many Bitcoin enthusiasts misinterpret this concept and use it to imply, "Since I'm paying in Bitcoin, any amount is better than using fiat currency!"
In reality, "value for value" primarily signifies that the exchange of money for goods inherently holds lasting value. Bitcoin exemplifies this principle, whereas fiat currency falls short in this regard.
I think we need to share this definition PLUS the practice of offering a few - not just one - peoce options for customers. Sort of like buying gas or a tiered subscription model.
Example:
1000 sats price to sustain
2000 sats is the price plus a "🤙⚡️tip"
3000 sats is the price for 🤙⚡️ plus X variable throw in.