V4V is great but, in my opinion, is dead on arrival. As a consumer in a V4V market I have no idea of the amount needed to sustain the project I am interacting with. What something is worth to me does not correlate with the amount required to sustain the project. Also, if sustaining the project is what's important to me, I lack access to that information.
Discussion
True this would help if content creators made their demands clear.
#v4v #pleb #grownostr
Daryn, I completely understand your perspective. To me, and hopefully to others as well, "value for value" does not equate to paying whatever you want.
I believe that many Bitcoin enthusiasts misinterpret this concept and use it to imply, "Since I'm paying in Bitcoin, any amount is better than using fiat currency!"
In reality, "value for value" primarily signifies that the exchange of money for goods inherently holds lasting value. Bitcoin exemplifies this principle, whereas fiat currency falls short in this regard.
I think we need to share this definition PLUS the practice of offering a few - not just one - peoce options for customers. Sort of like buying gas or a tiered subscription model.
Example:
1000 sats price to sustain
2000 sats is the price plus a "π€β‘οΈtip"
3000 sats is the price for π€β‘οΈ plus X variable throw in.
"V4V is great..."
What do you like about it?
It's awesome to be able to support people for things and work that I found valuable with out fiat rails. With out a middle man. With a sound money. I like that it's possible to opt out and remove my energy from a corrupt economic system and put it into and participate in a system build upon ideals and morals that align with my own. I like the ability and freedom that is afforded to any individual to enter the market and be rewarded for the value that are able to provide.